At the pinnacle of Inc.’s 5000 are situated the fastest growing and most profitable real estate companies in the United States. While their success records punctuated in the listings on this prestigious magazine speak volumes, we thought about how any company can stand to get better.
To that end, let’s look at just how effective the top five on Inc.’s list communicate via social media and their web footprints. The image above should warn you.
Looking at their corporate site, perhaps it’s appropriate for their landing to look cool and all business, even Web 1.0? Way down at the bottom of the website, you’ll also find their social media buttons for Facebook, LinkedIn, and the RSS if you are so inclined. Evidently anything called Twitter must sound to corny to add here? 285 likes on FB, but a super nice LI profile, gets the fastest growing real estate company in America – 3 of 10 SM Engagement. Maybe with Twitter they can grow as 12,000 % in the next three years?
Anyhow, the firm does have a nice LinkedIn profile with plenty of info. AND, a Facebook with all of 86 likes – they even posted to it twice this year already. I even found a picture of CEO Al Espinoza there! (at right) Twitter? Guys, help me out here…. 0 of 10 SM Engagement.
Interestingly, Landmark seems to favor Twitter over Facebook, with LinkedIn thrown in like the other corporate real estate players here. But with 74 followers, and the company following 184, Twitter could never be considered a serious connect point. With a website that offers a bare minimum by way of connection points, and no real social media engagement, Landmark actually wasted their time creating an online presence at all. 1 of 10 SM Engagement.
@MMREM is at least a decent try at a Twitter engagement with real tweets and 417 real followers. However, I am not sure beating zero engagement ial only marginally better than the businesses above is anywhere near what anyone would call excellent. Any company with “marketing” loosely described as an area of expertise NOT present in on the Internet channels… I’ll let you finish this. 3 of 10 SM Engagement.
Social channels for this company either still mean drinks on the 19th hole, or they just figure 2,540% growth is good enough? I often wonder why such efforts are even made to come online. With an Alexa rank of 3,685,471 no one visits their website anyway. And believe me, I HATE being so critical. Looking a bit deeper, if the company’s walk in address is correct, and Google Maps is, my assessment of golf links social methods is actually not too far off. Loan Resolution’s offices appear to be a strong 7 iron away from the 17th green. 0 of 10 SM Engagement.
To be brutally honest, after completing this assessment of Internet visibility and branding for these five Inc. movers, I am a bit aghast. Sure, in fairness some of these firms have more incentive than others where online visibility and connected-ness might play a role in their successes. Brand wise however, their efforts are pitiful given their resources. Why is any of this important?
Credibility, viability, growth potential, and potential for starters these few things dictate the necessity to reach into the digital space. And when mobile channels gain parity or exceed social/web models for connecting? These companies will never be able to ramp up – and if they can, the lost opportunity costs will be in the millions. If I have to explain this, the positive effects of constructive criticism are totally lost. For me, any company listed online in Inc.’s top ANYTHING, had better make damn sure when potential clients visit, they find SUPERB written all over a company. Lest the competitor next door be there already.
And I started this list with high expectations.
Fannie Mae said in a monthly survey released this week that consumer’s confidence in the…
Do you know who Josh Hall is? If you don't you soon will do. Josh…
Ask Brian is a weekly column by Real Estate Expert Brian Kline. If you have…